UK Appeal Court To Consider Depp’s Libel Case In March

ads

A combination of pictures shows US actress Amber Heard (L) and her former husband US actor Johnny Depp (R) arriving on the second day of Depp's libel action against News Group Newspapers (NGN), at the High Court in London, on July 8, 2020. ISABEL INFANTES / AFP
A combination of pictures shows US actress Amber Heard (L) and her former husband US actor Johnny Depp (R) arriving on the second day of Depp’s libel action against News Group Newspapers (NGN), at the High Court in London, on July 8, 2020. ISABEL INFANTES / AFP

 

Hollywood star Johnny Depp’s bid to overturn a British court’s high-profile libel ruling that he assaulted his ex-wife Amber Heard will be considered next month, it emerged on Tuesday.

The Court of Appeal in London will hear the application brought by the “Pirates of the Caribbean” actor to review the libel case against a UK newspaper group in the second half of March, it said.

In an order issued Monday, judge Nicholas Underhill said the appeal bid and an attempt to introduce new evidence not heard at last July’s trial would both be considered at the hearing between March 15 and 31.

See also  Cindy Lament About Her Friend After She Mistakenly Sent Her 200K Instead Of 20K

Depp, 57, lost his High Court libel claim in November against the publishers of The Sun newspaper over a 2018 article that branded him a “wife-beater”.

He was ordered to pay News Group Newspapers £628,000 ($857,000, 713,000 euros) in legal costs from the trial, which laid bare the actor’s chaotic lifestyle and battles with alcohol and drug addiction.

Judge Andrew Nicol, who heard the case, refused him grounds to appeal but said he could apply directly to the Court of Appeal to overturn his judgment, which Depp subsequently did.

See also  Love, Beach & Fun! Cardi B & Offset are Having a Lovely Baecation

In documents since filed with the Court of Appeal, Depp’s lawyer David Sherborne claimed Nicol’s judgment was “plainly wrong”.

He argued the judge had “failed to examine the competing accounts” of each incident of alleged violence by Depp towards Heard, or “explain whether he found them proved and, if so, on what basis”.

However, Adam Wolanski, the lawyer representing NGN, countered that Nicol had conducted “a painstaking analysis of the evidence”.

See also  Michael B. Jordan & Jay-Z are Producing a TV Series Based on Muhammad Ali’s Life

“There is no basis to conclude that the judge failed to examine the evidence or provide reasons for his findings,” he added in his submission.

After the November ruling, Depp said he had been asked to step down from his role in the “Fantastic Beasts” film franchise based on the book by Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling.

He is also suing Heard in the United States over a 2018 Washington Post article in which she claimed to be a victim of domestic violence.

ads

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply